Science

Israeli Researcher Discovers SIRT6 is the First Responder to DNA Damage.

3 Comments

Image Credits: BGU PRESS ROOM.

SIRT6 is the equivalent of a first responder to the site of DNA damage, the Toiber group at Ben-Gurion University of the Negev has discovered. A double strand break is the most serious type of DNA damage, because it can result in the loss of important genetic information, mistakes attaching the DNA back together, and inducing mutations in the DNA. SIRT6, a protein, senses the broken DNA, arriving at the “scene” just 3 seconds after damage occurs. Once there, it starts alerting the surroundings, calling for reinforcements that will repair the broken DNA.

Her findings were published recently in eLife.

Dr. Deborah Toiber and her group had previously discovered SIRT6’s role in repairing DNA damage, which ameliorates the effects of aging, cancer and neurodegenerative diseases, but this new discovery of SIRT6’s role as a sensor gives us the understanding of “starting over at Chapter 1 instead of jumping in at Chapter 3,” she says.

Toiber and others have been building a case around the importance of SIRT6 and this new discovery adds another layer of understanding.

“These findings lay the molecular groundwork for our future studies into SIRT6 and the crucial role it plays,” says Toiber.

There are only three other known sensors in the body that can detect broken strands of DNA. Now SIRT6 is the fourth. Importantly, these sensors seem to cooperate with each other to protect the DNA.

A lack of SIRT6 has been linked to shorter longevity in other studies of mammals from mice to beavers. Toiber’s previous research found that it was linked to the prevention of dementias in the elderly. The driving force behind aging is the DNA damage that does not get repaired, Toiber explains. A lack of SIRT6 increases the rate of DNA damage.

The findings are also relevant for cancer, according to Toiber. Chemotherapy causes DNA damage in the hopes of disrupting the proliferating cancer cells. Others have taken advantage of defects in DNA repair to kill cancerous cells. The idea is to block any channel to repair the DNA in cancer cells, killing them in a more targeted way. It is possible that blocking SIRT6 could be used to block one more channel and increase the efficiency of chemotherapy.

The research was supported by grants from the Israel Science Foundation.

Dr. Toiber is a member of the Department of Life Sciences, Faculty of Natural Sciences, BGU. She was just awarded a prestigious European Research Council (ERC) Starting Grant to further her research into SIRT6 and the other sensors’ roles in DNA repair.

You May Also Like

3 Comments. Leave new

  • […] Puedes leer la version en Ingles aquí / English version available here. […]

    Reply
  • A few issues with this report: 1) there is no mention of how this research was performed…was it in vitro or in vivo? In other words, are these results based upon cell culture experiments or actual experimentation in lab animals or humans subjects? This is essential information, as cell cultures do NOT constitute living being (human or other) findings. Humans (and other animals) represent 4 dimensional environments, which is to say their bodies are 3 dimensional and change with time, not static. Whereas, cell cultures are typically flat (2 dimensional) and rarely (if the researcher is on her/his toes) 3 dimensional (not flat) cultures. Yet, cell cultures do not change with time. They are static. This is a massive difference: apples and oranges. Little consequential science can come from inference, and asserting that what is seen in a cell culture (in vitro) is exactly what occurs in the body (in vivo) is absurd. 2) Again, the article (and, thus, the researchers?) assert that “The findings are also relevant for cancer…Chemotherapy causes DNA damage in the hopes of disrupting the proliferating cancer cells.” What the article (and Dr. Toiber) fail to mention is that said chemotherapy ALSO damages the DNA of healthy, ‘normal’ cells of the body (human or other animal). This makes chemotherapy, and radiation therapy, VERY dangerous options for the treatment of any diseases. Both cause further damage to the body’s cells and, moreover, to the body’s immune system. Given that the diseased individual’s immune system is already diminished by cancer or other disease, this is a tragically wrongheaded course of action. Immunotherapy – seeking to strengthen the body’s immune system in order to combat the disease process – makes abundantly more sense, and ought to be the gold standard for treatment…not chemotherapy or radiation.

    Reply
    • Dr. Toiber respectfully suggests you to read the scientific article in elife, which is open access. The link is in the published post. If you still has questions, then she’d be happy to answer them.

      Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Fill out this field
Fill out this field
Please enter a valid email address.
You need to agree with the terms to proceed

Menu